There are air cleaners to control airborne contaminants that are invisible to human eyes, too. They employ positive reactive substances that are invisible to users. How, then, a user will know if you make the air cleaner, just what it claims is the burning or electricity? A good start would be to verify the correct application. A review of quality must begin to focus on the safety of users. Security, which can be further divided into 2 different categories, is finally covered in thisArticles 2 Author for EzineArticles.com.
A review air purifier also has 2 other equally important criteria are:
(1) The test of effectiveness - the air filter technology based on sound scientific theory must be proven to work in a laboratory;
(2) proof of efficiency - the cleanest technology must be laboratory tested successfully in a device that plays the same lab results transplanted in setting the user at home, at school or at work. Suchdemanding test of significant resources throughout the user. The test of power must come from the laboratory field, and even then, a GLP-certified laboratory.
GAP, which stands for Good Laboratory Practice is a set of principles formulated by the OECD to ensure the production of high quality and reliable test data. The performance test is still difficult to achieve with consistency and objectivity, as it will be implemented at the sites users. Regardlessthese obstacles, a review of air purifier must be a proper assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of air purifiers. Proper-test include most if not all of the following:
(1) A controlled experiment
This involves rigorous testing of a statement known as an unproven hypothesis;
A technology with clear concise iteration of the science behind;
Check box - the impact of an operating air purifiers in a roomto be voted on before the impact, if there are cleaners available;
Replication - the experiment should be able to peer-reviewed, preferably by an independent third party to be authoritative;
Replication - the experiment have the same results at different times, where the conditions are identical to those of the show;
Replica - other separators in the same model should produce results very similar or identical;
(2) randomized double-standard - this is the highest standardmedical clinical trials in which both the researcher and the subject does not know if they are in actual experiment (where the air purifier works) or the control experiment (if not broken) clean air;
(3) A good test site - where all known factors variable that affects the performance of a detergent can be controlled, such as room size, temperature, humidity, the inclusion or exclusion of ambient air or to 'external
(4)Accurate measurement and recording - the effectiveness of an air purifier may vary over time and distance, the rates of air flow, the consistency of the instruments, etc.;
See (5) adequate means of special measures (photo) Under the Air Cleaner blog is often necessary, such as:
microbiological air sampler
Ozone Tester
positive and negative ion detector
Decibel meter.
(6) the right tools and skills of analysis - are necessary for precisionMeasurement and documentation of test results before and after the experimental analysis, such as mold cultures before and after the cleaning ionic air;
(7) The integrity of our employees is crucial tests so that test results are documented in a professional and reliable. Where were essentially all the above procedures on a cleaner from a GLP-certified laboratory, the results of the tests of effectiveness and efficiency of inputs to form a reliable air purifierReview. It is the mission of this visit the blog of these test data on how the cleaners as many as possible, with the aim of producing an air purifier reliable, objective assessments for the benefit of all users.
My Links : cheap flights to thailand
แสดงความคิดเห็น